在 C# 中解构元组的性能损失?

Performance penalties to deconstructing tuples in c#?

如果我们这样做

var (hello, world) = GetHelloAndWorldStrings();
if (hello == "hello" && world == "world")
  Environment.Exit(0);

除执行以下操作外,是否会产生任何额外费用:

var helloAndWorld = GetHelloAndWorldStrings();
if (helloAndWorld.Hello == "hello" && helloAndWorld.World == "world")
  Environment.Exit(0);

还是全是语法糖——最终生成的代码总是使用 Item1 和 Item2。

它们生成的 IL 实际上是相同的,只有很小的 emitted 差异,However。 .. 他们可能会 jitted 并优化为 完全 相同的指令。

给定

private (String hello,string world) GetHelloAndWorldStrings() 
{ 
   return ("asdsd","sadfsdf");
}
    
...
        

public int Test1()
{
   var asd = GetHelloAndWorldStrings();
   if (asd.hello == "hello" && asd.world == "world")
      return 1;
   return 0;
}

public int Test2()
{
   var (hello, world) = GetHelloAndWorldStrings();
   if (hello == "hello" && world == "world")
      return 1;
   return 0;
}

基本上会发出作为

public int Test1()
{
    ValueTuple<string, string> helloAndWorldStrings = GetHelloAndWorldStrings();
    if (helloAndWorldStrings.Item1 == "hello" && helloAndWorldStrings.Item2 == "world")
    {
        return 1;
    }
    return 0;
}

public int Test2()
{
    ValueTuple<string, string> helloAndWorldStrings = GetHelloAndWorldStrings();
    string item = helloAndWorldStrings.Item1;
    string item2 = helloAndWorldStrings.Item2;
    if (item == "hello" && item2 == "world")
    {
        return 1;
    }
    return 0;
}

You can check the IL out here

这里是 JIT ASM 的例子

C.Test1()
    L0000: push ebp
    L0001: mov ebp, esp
    L0003: push esi
    L0004: mov ecx, [0x11198648]
    L000a: mov esi, [0x1119864c]
    L0010: mov edx, [0x11198650]
    L0016: call System.String.Equals(System.String, System.String)
    L001b: test eax, eax
    L001d: je short L0038
    L001f: mov edx, [0x11198654]
    L0025: mov ecx, esi
    L0027: call System.String.Equals(System.String, System.String)
    L002c: test eax, eax
    L002e: je short L0038
    L0030: mov eax, 1
    L0035: pop esi
    L0036: pop ebp
    L0037: ret
    L0038: xor eax, eax
    L003a: pop esi
    L003b: pop ebp
    L003c: ret

C.Test2()
    L0000: push ebp
    L0001: mov ebp, esp
    L0003: push esi
    L0004: mov ecx, [0x11198648]
    L000a: mov esi, [0x1119864c]
    L0010: mov edx, [0x11198650]
    L0016: call System.String.Equals(System.String, System.String)
    L001b: test eax, eax
    L001d: je short L0038
    L001f: mov edx, [0x11198654]
    L0025: mov ecx, esi
    L0027: call System.String.Equals(System.String, System.String)
    L002c: test eax, eax
    L002e: je short L0038
    L0030: mov eax, 1
    L0035: pop esi
    L0036: pop ebp
    L0037: ret
    L0038: xor eax, eax
    L003a: pop esi
    L003b: pop ebp
    L003c: ret

简而言之,担心这个的净收益.. 减去你生命中的 5 分钟,你将永远无法回来

第三个选项与第一个相同:

  public int Test3()
  {
     var asd = GetHelloAndWorldStrings();
     if (asd == ("hello", "world"))
        return 1;
     return 0;
  }

它同样翻译成(sharplab.io):

public int Test3()
{
    ValueTuple<string, string> helloAndWorldStrings = GetHelloAndWorldStrings();
    if (helloAndWorldStrings.Item1 == "hello" && helloAndWorldStrings.Item2 == "world")
    {
        return 1;
    }
    return 0;
}

(sharplab.io)

.method public hidebysig 
    instance int32 Test3 () cil managed 
{
    // Method begins at RVA 0x2064
    // Code size 47 (0x2f)
    .maxstack 2
    .locals init (
        [0] valuetype [System.Private.CoreLib]System.ValueTuple`2<string, string>
    )

    IL_0000: ldarg.0
    IL_0001: call instance valuetype [System.Private.CoreLib]System.ValueTuple`2<string, string> C::GetHelloAndWorldStrings()
    IL_0006: stloc.0
    IL_0007: ldloc.0
    IL_0008: ldfld !0 valuetype [System.Private.CoreLib]System.ValueTuple`2<string, string>::Item1
    IL_000d: ldstr "hello"
    IL_0012: call bool [System.Private.CoreLib]System.String::op_Equality(string, string)
    IL_0017: brfalse.s IL_002d

    IL_0019: ldloc.0
    IL_001a: ldfld !1 valuetype [System.Private.CoreLib]System.ValueTuple`2<string, string>::Item2
    IL_001f: ldstr "world"
    IL_0024: call bool [System.Private.CoreLib]System.String::op_Equality(string, string)
    IL_0029: brfalse.s IL_002d

    IL_002b: ldc.i4.1
    IL_002c: ret

    IL_002d: ldc.i4.0
    IL_002e: ret
} // end of method C::Test3