如何从 HermiT 输出中确定 ontology 中的问题所在
How to determine where the problem is in an ontology from HermiT output
我是新手。我已经能够 运行 一些示例,例如 pizza.owl
或 travel.owl
。然后我打开了一个其他人创建的 ontology,当我 运行 HermiT 推理器时,我收到以下错误:
An error occurred during reasoning: String '^(\(?\+?[0-9]*\)?)?[ \.\-])?(\(?[0-9]*\)?)?[0-9A-Z \.\-\(\)]*((x|ext|extension)? ?[0-9]*)?$' in the datatype restriction org.semanticweb.HermiT.datatypes.rdfplainliteral.RDFPlainLiteralDatatypeHandler@64cf23b2 is not a valid regular expression..
org.semanticweb.HermiT.datatypes.UnsupportedFacetException: String '^(\(?\+?[0-9]*\)?)?[ \.\-])?(\(?[0-9]*\)?)?[0-9A-Z \.\-\(\)]*((x|ext|extension)? ?[0-9]*)?$' in the datatype restriction org.semanticweb.HermiT.datatypes.rdfplainliteral.RDFPlainLiteralDatatypeHandler@64cf23b2 is not a valid regular expression.
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.datatypes.rdfplainliteral.RDFPlainLiteralDatatypeHandler.validateDatatypeRestriction(RDFPlainLiteralDatatypeHandler.java:126) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.datatypes.DatatypeRegistry.validateDatatypeRestriction(DatatypeRegistry.java:113) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.structural.OWLClausification$DataRangeConverter.visit(OWLClausification.java:880) ~[na:na]
at uk.ac.manchester.cs.owl.owlapi.OWLDatatypeRestrictionImpl.accept(OWLDatatypeRestrictionImpl.java:136) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.structural.OWLClausification$DataRangeConverter.convertDataRange(OWLClausification.java:820) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.structural.OWLClausification$NormalizedAxiomClausifier.visit(OWLClausification.java:647) ~[na:na]
at uk.ac.manchester.cs.owl.owlapi.OWLDataAllValuesFromImpl.accept(OWLDataAllValuesFromImpl.java:82) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.structural.OWLClausification.clausify(OWLClausification.java:235) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.structural.OWLClausification.preprocessAndClausify(OWLClausification.java:165) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.Reasoner.loadOntology(Reasoner.java:211) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.Reasoner.<init>(Reasoner.java:202) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.Reasoner.<init>(Reasoner.java:176) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.ReasonerFactory.createHermiTOWLReasoner(ReasonerFactory.java:51) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.ReasonerFactory.createReasoner(ReasonerFactory.java:19) ~[na:na]
at org.protege.editor.owl.model.inference.ReasonerUtilities.createReasoner(ReasonerUtilities.java:20) ~[na:na]
at org.protege.editor.owl.model.inference.OWLReasonerManagerImpl$ClassificationRunner.ensureRunningReasonerInitialized(OWLReasonerManagerImpl.java:428) ~[na:na]
at org.protege.editor.owl.model.inference.OWLReasonerManagerImpl$ClassificationRunner.run(OWLReasonerManagerImpl.java:386) ~[na:na]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) ~[na:1.8.0_121]
ontology 中定义的字符串似乎有问题(但我可能错了)。关于如何确定问题出在哪里的任何建议 ontology?
我正在使用 Protege 5.5.0
谢谢!
来自
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.structural.OWLClausification$DataRangeConverter.convertDataRange(OWLClausification.java:820)
Data property
的 Range
规范似乎有问题。因此,转到 Protege 中的“数据属性”选项卡并查找具有范围规范的数据 属性 并删除范围规范(假设您已经复制了原始 ontology)。
一般来说,当与 ontology 作斗争时,我会从 ontology 中删除公理,直到它一致或不出错。然后我会慢慢加回公理,直到我再次失败。
我是新手。我已经能够 运行 一些示例,例如 pizza.owl
或 travel.owl
。然后我打开了一个其他人创建的 ontology,当我 运行 HermiT 推理器时,我收到以下错误:
An error occurred during reasoning: String '^(\(?\+?[0-9]*\)?)?[ \.\-])?(\(?[0-9]*\)?)?[0-9A-Z \.\-\(\)]*((x|ext|extension)? ?[0-9]*)?$' in the datatype restriction org.semanticweb.HermiT.datatypes.rdfplainliteral.RDFPlainLiteralDatatypeHandler@64cf23b2 is not a valid regular expression..
org.semanticweb.HermiT.datatypes.UnsupportedFacetException: String '^(\(?\+?[0-9]*\)?)?[ \.\-])?(\(?[0-9]*\)?)?[0-9A-Z \.\-\(\)]*((x|ext|extension)? ?[0-9]*)?$' in the datatype restriction org.semanticweb.HermiT.datatypes.rdfplainliteral.RDFPlainLiteralDatatypeHandler@64cf23b2 is not a valid regular expression.
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.datatypes.rdfplainliteral.RDFPlainLiteralDatatypeHandler.validateDatatypeRestriction(RDFPlainLiteralDatatypeHandler.java:126) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.datatypes.DatatypeRegistry.validateDatatypeRestriction(DatatypeRegistry.java:113) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.structural.OWLClausification$DataRangeConverter.visit(OWLClausification.java:880) ~[na:na]
at uk.ac.manchester.cs.owl.owlapi.OWLDatatypeRestrictionImpl.accept(OWLDatatypeRestrictionImpl.java:136) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.structural.OWLClausification$DataRangeConverter.convertDataRange(OWLClausification.java:820) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.structural.OWLClausification$NormalizedAxiomClausifier.visit(OWLClausification.java:647) ~[na:na]
at uk.ac.manchester.cs.owl.owlapi.OWLDataAllValuesFromImpl.accept(OWLDataAllValuesFromImpl.java:82) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.structural.OWLClausification.clausify(OWLClausification.java:235) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.structural.OWLClausification.preprocessAndClausify(OWLClausification.java:165) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.Reasoner.loadOntology(Reasoner.java:211) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.Reasoner.<init>(Reasoner.java:202) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.Reasoner.<init>(Reasoner.java:176) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.ReasonerFactory.createHermiTOWLReasoner(ReasonerFactory.java:51) ~[na:na]
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.ReasonerFactory.createReasoner(ReasonerFactory.java:19) ~[na:na]
at org.protege.editor.owl.model.inference.ReasonerUtilities.createReasoner(ReasonerUtilities.java:20) ~[na:na]
at org.protege.editor.owl.model.inference.OWLReasonerManagerImpl$ClassificationRunner.ensureRunningReasonerInitialized(OWLReasonerManagerImpl.java:428) ~[na:na]
at org.protege.editor.owl.model.inference.OWLReasonerManagerImpl$ClassificationRunner.run(OWLReasonerManagerImpl.java:386) ~[na:na]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) ~[na:1.8.0_121]
ontology 中定义的字符串似乎有问题(但我可能错了)。关于如何确定问题出在哪里的任何建议 ontology?
我正在使用 Protege 5.5.0
谢谢!
来自
at org.semanticweb.HermiT.structural.OWLClausification$DataRangeConverter.convertDataRange(OWLClausification.java:820)
Data property
的 Range
规范似乎有问题。因此,转到 Protege 中的“数据属性”选项卡并查找具有范围规范的数据 属性 并删除范围规范(假设您已经复制了原始 ontology)。
一般来说,当与 ontology 作斗争时,我会从 ontology 中删除公理,直到它一致或不出错。然后我会慢慢加回公理,直到我再次失败。