以编程方式添加安全方案时,架构从组件中消失

Schemas disappear from components when programmatically adding security scheme

我最近从 Springfox 转换为 Springdoc-openapi 以便为我的 Spring Boot Rest [生成我的 OpenAPI API服务。

在我添加安全方案之前,一切都运行良好。一旦我这样做了,我的方案就不再出现,并且在 SwaggerUI 页面上出现错误:

Could not resolve reference: Could not resolve pointer: /components/schemas/Ping does not exist in document

我正在以编程方式设置我的配置,并且有 2 个组。

我正在使用 Spring Boot v2.4.0 with springdoc-openapi-ui v1.5.1

我的 pom.xml 片段:

        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.springdoc</groupId>
            <artifactId>springdoc-openapi-ui</artifactId>
            <version>1.5.1</version>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.springdoc</groupId>
            <artifactId>springdoc-openapi-hateoas</artifactId>
            <version>1.5.1</version>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.springdoc</groupId>
            <artifactId>springdoc-openapi-security</artifactId>
            <version>1.5.1</version>
        </dependency>

来自配置的片段:

    @Bean
public GroupedOpenApi apiV1() {
    String[] paths = {"/v1/**"};
    String[] packagesToScan = {"com.test.controller"};
    return GroupedOpenApi.builder()
            .group("v1")
            .packagesToScan(packagesToScan)
            .pathsToMatch(paths)
            .addOpenApiCustomiser(buildV1OpenAPI())
            .build();
}

@Bean
public GroupedOpenApi apiV2() {
    String[] paths = {"/v2/**"};
    String[] packagesToScan = {"com.test.controller"};
    return GroupedOpenApi.builder()
            .group("v2")
            .packagesToScan(packagesToScan)
            .pathsToMatch(paths)
            .addOpenApiCustomiser(buildV2OpenAPI())
            .build();
}

public OpenApiCustomiser buildV1OpenAPI() {
    return openApi -> openApi.info(apiInfo().version("v1"));
}

public OpenApiCustomiser buildV2OpenAPI() {
    final String securitySchemeName = "Access Token";
    return openApi -> openApi.info(apiInfo().version("v2"))
            .addSecurityItem(new SecurityRequirement().addList(securitySchemeName))
            .components(new Components().addSecuritySchemes(securitySchemeName, new SecurityScheme()
                    .type(SecurityScheme.Type.APIKEY)
                    .in(SecurityScheme.In.HEADER)
                    .name(HttpHeaders.AUTHORIZATION)));
}

// Describe the apis
private Info apiInfo() {
    return new Info()
            .title("Title")
            .description("API Description");
}

对于我的 v1 组,一切正常。我的模式出现在 Swagger UI 页面上,我在生成的 api-doc.

的组件部分看到它们
    "components": {
    "schemas": {
        "ApplicationErrorResponse": {
            ...
            }
        },
        "Ping": {
            ...
        }
    }
}

对于我的 v2 组,未生成架构。

    "components": {
    "securitySchemes": {
        "Access Token": {
            "type": "apiKey",
            "name": "Authorization",
            "in": "header"
        }
    }
}

知道为什么在以编程方式将安全方案添加到 OpenAPI 组件时没有自动扫描和添加我的方案吗?我的配置中是否缺少某些内容?

这是我在控制器中的请求映射。

@Operation(summary = "Verify API and backend connectivity",
        description = "Confirm connectivity to the backend, as well and verify API service is running.")
@OkResponse
@GetMapping(value = API_VERSION_2 + "/ping", produces = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
public ResponseEntity<Ping> getPingV2(HttpServletRequest request) {

... }

这是我的@OkResponse 注释:

    @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target({ElementType.TYPE, ElementType.METHOD})
@Documented
@ApiResponse(responseCode = HTTP_200,
        description = HTTP_200_OK,
        headers = {
                @Header(name = CONTENT_VERSION_HEADER, description = CONTENT_VERSION_HEADER_DESCRIPTION, schema = @Schema(type = "string")),
                @Header(name = DEPRECATION_MESSAGE_HEADER, description = DEPRECATION_MESSAGE_HEADER_DESCRIPTION, schema = @Schema(type = "string")),
                @Header(name = DESCRIPTION_HEADER, description = DESCRIPTION_HEADER_DESCRIPTION, schema = @Schema(type = "string"))
        })
public @interface OkResponse {
}

我的 v1 映射定义类似。

因此,似乎当完全依赖 OpenApiCustomiser 来创建 OpenAPI 时,扫描的组件将被忽略,或者至少被定制器中指定的组件覆盖(我也可以通过编程添加了我所有的模式,但是维护起来会非常麻烦)。

将我的配置更改为以下内容解决了我的问题:

@Bean
public OpenAPI customOpenAPI() {
    final String securitySchemeName = "Access Token";
    return new OpenAPI()
            .addSecurityItem(new SecurityRequirement().addList(securitySchemeName))
            .components(new Components().addSecuritySchemes(securitySchemeName, new SecurityScheme()
                    .type(SecurityScheme.Type.APIKEY)
                    .in(SecurityScheme.In.HEADER)
                    .name(HttpHeaders.AUTHORIZATION)))
            .info(apiInfo());
}

@Bean
public GroupedOpenApi apiV1() {
    String[] paths = {"/v1/**"};
    String[] packagesToScan = {"com.test.controller"};
    return GroupedOpenApi.builder()
            .group("v1")
            .packagesToScan(packagesToScan)
            .pathsToMatch(paths)
            .addOpenApiCustomiser(buildV1OpenAPI())
            .build();
}

@Bean
public GroupedOpenApi apiV2() {
    String[] paths = {"/v2/**"};
    String[] packagesToScan = {"com.test.controller"};
    return GroupedOpenApi.builder()
            .group("v2")
            .packagesToScan(packagesToScan)
            .pathsToMatch(paths)
            .addOpenApiCustomiser(buildV2OpenAPI())
            .build();
}

public OpenApiCustomiser buildV1OpenAPI() {
    return openApi -> openApi.info(openApi.getInfo().version("v1"));
}

public OpenApiCustomiser buildV2OpenAPI() {
    return openApi -> openApi.info(openApi.getInfo().version("v2"));
}

// Describe the apis
private Info apiInfo() {
    return new Info()
            .title("Title")
            .description("API Description.");
}

虽然这在技术上确实也将授权按钮和安全方案添加到 v1 组,但可以忽略它,因为那些 API 端点无论如何都不安全(内部 API 他们应该去无论如何很快就会离开)。

无论如何,这可能是一个更好的解决方案,因为各组之间的信息基本相同。

与其创建新组件,不如修改它们:

public OpenApiCustomiser buildV2OpenAPI() {
    final String securitySchemeName = "Access Token";
    return openApi -> {
        openApi.info(apiInfo().version("v2"))
            .addSecurityItem(new SecurityRequirement().addList(securitySchemeName));
        
        openApi.getComponents().addSecuritySchemes(securitySchemeName, new SecurityScheme()
            .type(SecurityScheme.Type.APIKEY)
            .in(SecurityScheme.In.HEADER)
            .name(HttpHeaders.AUTHORIZATION));

        return openApi;
    
    };
}