这些把安全数组转成std::list对象的方法能转成模板函数吗?

Can these methods that convert safe arrays into std::list objects be turned into a template function?

采用这三种方法,每种方法都从安全数组中构建不同的 std::list 对象:

void CMSATools::ConvertSAFEARRAY_DISCUSSIONITEMS(SAFEARRAY* psaDiscussionItems, ListDiscussionItems& rListDiscussionItems)
{
    MSAToolsLibrary::IDiscussionItemPtr* pVals = nullptr;
    HRESULT hr = SafeArrayAccessData(psaDiscussionItems, (void**)&pVals); // direct access to SA memory

    if (SUCCEEDED(hr))
    {
        long lowerBound, upperBound;  // get array bounds
        hr = SafeArrayGetLBound(psaDiscussionItems, 1, &lowerBound);
        if (FAILED(hr))
            throw _com_error(hr);

        hr = SafeArrayGetUBound(psaDiscussionItems, 1, &upperBound);
        if (FAILED(hr))
            throw _com_error(hr);

        rListDiscussionItems.clear();
        long cnt_elements = upperBound - lowerBound + 1;
        for (int i = 0; i < cnt_elements; ++i)  // iterate through returned values
        {
            rListDiscussionItems.push_back(pVals[i]);
        }
        hr = SafeArrayUnaccessData(psaDiscussionItems);
        if (FAILED(hr))
            throw _com_error(hr);
    }
    else
    {
        throw _com_error(hr);
    }

    hr = SafeArrayDestroy(psaDiscussionItems);
    if (FAILED(hr))
        throw _com_error(hr);
}

void CMSATools::ConvertSAFEARRAY_STUDENTITEMS(SAFEARRAY* psaStudentItems, ListStudentItems& rListStudentItems)
{
    MSAToolsLibrary::IStudentItemPtr    *pVals = nullptr;
    HRESULT hr = SafeArrayAccessData(psaStudentItems, (void**)&pVals); // direct access to SA memory

    if (SUCCEEDED(hr))
    {
        long lowerBound, upperBound;  // get array bounds
        hr = SafeArrayGetLBound(psaStudentItems, 1, &lowerBound);
        if (FAILED(hr))
            throw _com_error(hr);

        hr = SafeArrayGetUBound(psaStudentItems, 1, &upperBound);
        if (FAILED(hr))
            throw _com_error(hr);

        rListStudentItems.clear();
        long cnt_elements = upperBound - lowerBound + 1;
        for (int i = 0; i < cnt_elements; ++i)  // iterate through returned values
        {
            rListStudentItems.push_back(pVals[i]);
        }
        hr = SafeArrayUnaccessData(psaStudentItems);
        if (FAILED(hr))
            throw _com_error(hr);
    }
    else
    {
        throw _com_error(hr);
    }

    hr = SafeArrayDestroy(psaStudentItems);
    if (FAILED(hr))
        throw _com_error(hr);
}

void CMSATools::ConvertSAFEARRAY_DUTYHISTORYITEMS(SAFEARRAY* psaHistoryItems, ListDutyHistoryLookupItems& rListHistoryItems)
{
    MSAToolsLibrary::IDutyAssignmentLookupPtr   *pVals = nullptr;
    HRESULT hr = SafeArrayAccessData(psaHistoryItems, (void**)&pVals); // direct access to SA memory

    if (SUCCEEDED(hr))
    {
        long lowerBound, upperBound;  // get array bounds
        hr = SafeArrayGetLBound(psaHistoryItems, 1, &lowerBound);
        if (FAILED(hr))
            throw _com_error(hr);

        hr = SafeArrayGetUBound(psaHistoryItems, 1, &upperBound);
        if (FAILED(hr))
            throw _com_error(hr);

        rListHistoryItems.clear();
        long cnt_elements = upperBound - lowerBound + 1;
        for (int i = 0; i < cnt_elements; ++i)  // iterate through returned values
        {
            rListHistoryItems.push_back(pVals[i]);
        }
        hr = SafeArrayUnaccessData(psaHistoryItems);
        if (FAILED(hr))
            throw _com_error(hr);
    }
    else
    {
        throw _com_error(hr);
    }

    hr = SafeArrayDestroy(psaHistoryItems);
    if (FAILED(hr))
        throw _com_error(hr);
}

它们都可以正常工作。但它们有很多共同点。可以在这里使用“模板”吗?这不是我以前做过的事情。

我不介意拥有三种不同的方法,但如果它们可以调用一种通用的模板化方法来转换安全数组,那将使代码维护更容易。

有道理吗?

试试这个(没有编译它):

template<typename from, typename to>
void CMSATools::ConvertSAFEARRAY_DUTYHISTORYITEMS(SAFEARRAY* psaItems, to& rItems)
{
  from   *pVals = nullptr;
  HRESULT hr = SafeArrayAccessData(psaItems, (void**)&pVals); // direct access to SA memory

  if (SUCCEEDED(hr))
  {
    long lowerBound, upperBound;  // get array bounds
    hr = SafeArrayGetLBound(psaItems, 1, &lowerBound);
    if (FAILED(hr))
      throw _com_error(hr);

    hr = SafeArrayGetUBound(psaItems, 1, &upperBound);
    if (FAILED(hr))
      throw _com_error(hr);

    rItems.clear();
    long cnt_elements = upperBound - lowerBound + 1;
    for (int i = 0; i < cnt_elements; ++i)  // iterate through returned values
    {
      rItems.push_back(pVals[i]);
    }
    hr = SafeArrayUnaccessData(psaItems);
    if (FAILED(hr))
      throw _com_error(hr);
  }
  else
  {
    throw _com_error(hr);
  }

  hr = SafeArrayDestroy(psaItems);
  if (FAILED(hr))
    throw _com_error(hr);
}

是的,看起来这些函数的主体非常相似,很容易将它们全部折叠成一个函数模板。

但是不,我不认为这是正确的方法。相反,我会创建一个小代理 class 让 SAFEARRAY 像一个范围一样。

#include <windows.h>
#include <oleauto.h>


template <class F, class ...Args>
void check(F f, Args ...args) {
    auto hr = f(args...);
    if (FAILED(hr))
        throw hr;
}

template <class T>
class SafeArrayRange {
    SAFEARRAY *data;
    T* pVals {nullptr};
    long count;
public:
    using value_type = T;
    using reference = T&;
    using pointer = T*;
    using difference_type = std::ptrdiff_t;
    using iterator_tag = std::random_access_iterator_tag;

    SafeArrayRange(SAFEARRAY *array) : data(array) {
        check(SafeArrayAccessData, data, (void**)&pVals);
        long lowerBound;
        check(SafeArrayGetLBound, data, 1, &lowerBound);
        long upperBound;
        check(SafeArrayGetUBound, data, 1, &upperBound);
        count = upperBound - lowerBound + 1;
    }

    using iterator = T*;

    iterator begin() const { return pVals; }
    iterator end() const { return pVals + count;  }
    std::size_t size() const { return count; }
    ~SafeArrayRange() { SafeArrayUnaccessData(data); }
};

有了它,我可以像对待 vector 或其他普通容器一样对待 SAFEARRAY。例如,我至少使用以下代码对范围适配器进行了最小测试:


int main() {
    SAFEARRAY* array = SafeArrayCreateVector(VT_I4, 0, 20);

    SafeArrayRange<uint32_t> range(array);

    // put data into the array:
    std::iota(range.begin(), range.end(), 0);

    // check that our idea of its size matches what we specified:
    std::cout << "range size: " << range.size() << "\n";

    std::vector<uint32_t> result;

    // get data back out of the array:
    std::copy(range.begin(), range.end(), std::back_inserter(result));

    // print out the contents of the array:
    std::copy(range.begin(), range.end(), std::ostream_iterator<uint32_t>(std::cout, "\t"));
}

所以,我将范围适配器放入 header 并在需要的地方包含它,所以大多数时候我可以忽略 SAFEARRAY 的大部分内部细节。警告:这只是最低限度的测试,所以这里和那里可能有一些我遗漏的点点滴滴。