为什么 toRaw(obj) 保持反应性?

Why is toRaw(obj) maintaining reactivity?

我对 toRaw() 的反应性感到困惑。

App.vue

<template>
  <img alt="Vue logo" src="./assets/logo.png" />
  <TheForm @newThing="addNewThing" />
  <TheList :allTheThings="allTheThings" />
</template>

<script setup>
  import TheForm from "./components/TheForm.vue";
  import TheList from "./components/TheList.vue";

  import { ref } from "vue";

  const allTheThings = ref([]);
  const addNewThing = (thing) => allTheThings.value.push(thing);
</script>

TheForm.vue

<template>
  <h3>Add New Thing</h3>
  <form @submit.prevent="addNewThing">
    <input type="text" placeholder="description" v-model="thing.desc" />
    <input type="number" placeholder="number" v-model="thing.number" />
    <button type="submit">Add New Thing</button>
  </form>
</template>

<script setup>
  import { reactive, defineEmit, toRaw } from "vue";

  const emit = defineEmit(["newThing"]);

  const thing = reactive({
    desc: "",
    number: 0,
  });

  const addNewThing = () => emit("newThing", thing);
</script>

TheList.vue

<template>
  <h3>The List</h3>
  <ol>
    <li v-for="(thing, idx) in allTheThings" :key="idx">
      {{ thing.desc }} || {{ thing.number }}
    </li>
  </ol>
</template>

<script setup>
  import { defineProps } from "vue";

  defineProps({
    allTheThings: Array,
  });
</script>

由于代码将代理传递给数据,因此它的行为令人怀疑:提交表单后,如果您重新编辑表单字段中的数据,它也会编辑列表的输出。很好

所以我想在 addNewThing 中传递 thing 的非反应性副本:

  const addNewThing = () => {
    const clone = { ...thing };
    emit("newThing", clone);
  };

它按预期工作。

如果我改用 const clone = toRaw(thing); 是行不通的。 如果我记录每个的输出,{ …thing}toRaw(thing) 完全相同那么为什么 toRaw() 似乎没有失去它的反应性?

任何光照都会,好吧……启发。

我认为问题在于对 toRaw 的作用存在误解。

Returns the raw, original object of a reactive or readonly proxy. This is an escape hatch that can be used to temporarily read without incurring proxy access/tracking overhead or write without triggering changes. It is not recommended to hold a persistent reference to the original object. Use with caution.

toRaw 将 return 原始代理,而不是代理内容的副本,因此您使用 const clone = { ...thing }; 的解决方案是恕我直言,希望这个解释足够了.

有关详细信息,请参阅类似问题