具有两个依赖服务的循环依赖

Circular Dependency with two depending Services

我是 C# 和依赖注入的新手。目前我正在做一个新项目,想在技术上取得进步。

在这个项目中,我遇到了三种导致循环依赖的情况。

我已经阅读了很多关于此的内容并找到了 Lazy<T>IServiceProvider 等解决方案,但我想学习针对此问题的干净解决方案,并希望遵循最常见的建议重构代码。

我们在这个例子中有四个服务:

AccountService -> 登录、注销等

HttpService -> 做 API-Stuff

LogService -> 做一些日志记录

LogRepository -> 用于日志记录的 CRUD table / EF 的包装器

AccountService 使用 HttpService 通过 API 进行身份验证。稍后,我想使用 HttpService 通过 API 获取更多数据。 HttpService 现在需要 AccountService 来获取令牌以验证请求。这会导致循环依赖错误。

账户服务

public interface IAccountService
{
    Identity Identity { get; }
    Task Login(Credentials Credentials);
    Task Logout();
}

public class AccountService : IAccountService
{
    public Identity Identity { get; private set; }
    
    private readonly IHttpService _httpService;
    private readonly ILogService _logService;
    
    public AccountService(
        IHttpService HttpService, ILogService LogService)
    {
        _httpService = HttpService;
        _logService = LogService;
    }

    public async Task Login(Credentials Credentials)
    {
        Identity = await _httpService.Post<Identity>(
            "api/rest/v1/user/authenticate", Credentials);
    }
}

HttpService

public interface IHttpService
{
    Task<T> Get<T>(string uri);
    Task Post(string uri, object value);
    Task<T> Post<T>(string uri, object value);
}

public class HttpService : IHttpService
{
    private readonly HttpClient _httpClient;
    private readonly IAccountService _accountService;
    private readonly ILogService _logService; 

    public HttpService(
        HttpClient HttpClient,
        IAccountService AccountService,
        ILogService ILogService)
    {
        _httpClient = HttpClient;
        _accountService = AccountService;
        _logService = LogService;
    }

    private async Task AddAuthentication(HttpRequestMessage Request)
    {
        Request.Headers.Authorization = new AuthenticationHeaderValue(
            "bearer", _accountService.Identity.SystemToken);
    }
}

解决或适当重新设计这个问题的最佳做法是什么?

我有更多的循环依赖,例如在 LogRepository 中使用 LogService 或在 HttpService 中使用 LogService (因为 HttpService 将日志条目发送到服务器)。

非常感谢您的帮助!

虽然你的对象图是循环的(AccountService -> HttpService -> AccountService)你的调用图 不是。调用可能如下所示:

AccountService.Login
    -> HttpService.Post
        -> HttpService.AddAuthentication
            -> AccountService.Identity

具有非循环调用图的循环对象图经常发生在违反Single Responsibly Principle的组件上。获得的功能(方法)越多 类,它们的对象图变得循环的可能性就越大。将 类 拆分为更小、更集中的部分,不仅可以解决循环依赖问题,而且通常还可以改进应用程序的设计。

我认为您的情况实际上与我在 section 6.3 of DIPP&P 中讨论的示例非常相似。该部分专门讨论修复循环依赖性。

长话短说,我认为最好的选择是将 AccountService 分成(至少)两个服务:

  • 一个服务负责登录和注销
  • 第二个服务负责获取用户的身份。

这两种服务都有自己的界面,与 IAccountService 相比,这些新界面现在的范围更小。这会提高您遵守 Interface Segregation Principle.

的机会

这是一个例子:

让我们从新的接口定义开始:

// Contains Login and Logout methods of old IAccountService
public interface IAuthenticationService
{
    Task Login(Credentials Credentials);
    Task Logout();
}

// Contains Identity property of old IAccountService
public interface IIdentityProvider
{
    // For simplicity I added a setter to the interface, because that keeps
    // the example simple, but it is possible to keep Identity read-only if
    // required.
    Identity Identity { get; set; }
}

// This interface is kept unchanged.
public interface IHttpService
{
    Task<T> Get<T>(string uri);
    Task Post(string uri, object value);
    Task<T> Post<T>(string uri, object value);
}

让我们看看接下来的实现,从 IAuthenticationService 实现开始:

// Old AccountService, now depending on IIdentityProvider
public class AuthenticationService : IAuthenticationService
{
    private readonly IHttpService _httpService;
    private readonly ILogService _logService;
    private readonly IIdentityProvider _identityProvider;
    
    public AccountService(
        IHttpService HttpService,
        ILogService LogService,
        IIdentityProvider IdentityProvider)
    {
        _httpService = HttpService;
        _logService = LogService;
        _identityProvider = IdentityProvider;
    }

    public async Task Login(Credentials Credentials)
    {
        _identityProvider.Identity = await _httpService.Post<Identity>(
            "api/rest/v1/user/authenticate", Credentials);
    }
}

这个“新的”AuthenticationService 包含了 AccountService 的部分代码,其余的旧 AccountService 逻辑隐藏在新的 IIdentityProvider 抽象之后,它被注入 AuthenticationService。这个重构和DIPP&P的Facade Service refactoring (for an elaborate discussion on the Facade Service refactoring, see section 6.1很像。

IdentityProvider 实现新的 IIdentityProvider 接口并包含来自 AccountService:

的旧逻辑
public class IdentityProvider : IIdentityProvider
{
    public Identity Identity { get; set; }
}

最后,HttpService 现在依赖于 IIdentityProvider 而不是 IAccountService:

// Now depends on IIdentityProvider instead of IAccountService
public class HttpService : IHttpService
{
    private readonly HttpClient _httpClient;
    private readonly IIdentityProvider _identityProvider;
    private readonly ILogService _logService; 

    public HttpService(
        HttpClient HttpClient,
        IIdentityProvider IdentityProvider,
        ILogService ILogService)
    {
        _httpClient = HttpClient;
        _identityProvider = IdentityProvider;
        _logService = LogService;
    }

    private async Task AddAuthentication(HttpRequestMessage Request)
    {
        // Now uses the new IIdentityProvider dependency instead
        // of the old IAccountService, which caused the cycle.
        Request.Headers.Authorization = new AuthenticationHeaderValue(
            "bearer", _identityProvider.Identity.SystemToken);
    }
}

使用这种新设计,对象图不再是循环的,可以构造如下:

var identity = new IdentityProvider();
var logger = new LogService();

new AccountService(
    new HttpService(
        new HttpClient(...),
        identity,
        logger),
    logger,
    identity);