只有方案 + 路径的 URL 有效吗?

Is a URL with only scheme + path valid?

我知道仅绝对路径 URLs (/path/to/resource) 是有效的,并且指的是与当前资源相同的方案、主机、端口等。如果添加相同(或不同!)方案,URL 是否仍然有效? (http:/path/to/resourcehttps:/path/to/resource)

如果它 根据规范的字母是有效的,浏览器处理它的效果如何?未来可能会遇到代码的开发人员如何处理它?

附录:

这是我在 Apache 服务器上设置的一个简单测试用例:

resource/number/one/index.html:

<a href="http:/resource/number/two/">link</a>

resource/number/two/index.html:

two

在 OS X 上 Chrome 43 中进行测试:将鼠标悬停在 link 上时显示的 URL 看起来是正确的。单击 link 按预期工作。查看 Web 检查器中的 DOM,将鼠标悬停在 a href URL 上会显示不正确的位置 (/resource/number/one/http:/resource/number/two/)。

Firefox 38 似乎也能正确处理点击。奇怪。

不,无效。来自 RFC 3986:

4.2.  Relative Reference

   A relative reference takes advantage of the hierarchical syntax
   (Section 1.2.3) to express a URI reference relative to the name space
   of another hierarchical URI.

      relative-ref  = relative-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

      relative-part = "//" authority path-abempty
                    / path-absolute
                    / path-noscheme
                    / path-empty

   The URI referred to by a relative reference, also known as the target
   URI, is obtained by applying the reference resolution algorithm of
   Section 5.

   A relative reference that begins with two slash characters is termed
   a network-path reference; such references are rarely used.  A
   relative reference that begins with a single slash character is
   termed an absolute-path reference.  A relative reference that does
   not begin with a slash character is termed a relative-path reference.

   A path segment that contains a colon character (e.g., "this:that")
   cannot be used as the first segment of a relative-path reference, as
   it would be mistaken for a scheme name.  Such a segment must be
   preceded by a dot-segment (e.g., "./this:that") to make a relative-
   path reference.

其中 path-noscheme 特别是一条不以 / 开头的路径,其第一段不包含冒号,这非常具体地解决了您的问题。