Polygon 区块链上 MetaMask 的内部 JSON-RPC 错误。 `ERC721:转移呼叫者不是所有者,也不是批准的。`
Internal JSON-RPC error with MetaMask on Polygon Blockchain. `ERC721: transfer caller is not owner nor approved.`
我正在做一个 NFT 市场。当我在孟买测试网上部署我的合同时。 createToken 函数可能会工作,因为它会为 Gas Fee 调出 Metamask,但在那之后,会发生关于 ONWNERSHIP 的错误。
(下方有错误图片和文字。)
我遵循的步骤
npm hardhat node
npm run dev
- 选择创建页面。
- 输入所有详细信息。
- 单击调用 createToken 函数的创建资产。
然后出现错误。
这是我的 NFT 合约
contract NFT is ERC721URIStorage {
using Counters for Counters.Counter;
Counters.Counter private _tokenIds;
address contractAddress;
constructor(address marketplaceAddress) ERC721("Metaverse Tokens", "METT") {
contractAddress = marketplaceAddress;
}
function createToken(string memory tokenURI) public returns (uint256) {
_tokenIds.increment();
uint256 newItemId = _tokenIds.current();
_mint(msg.sender, newItemId);
_setTokenURI(newItemId, tokenURI);
setApprovalForAll(contractAddress, true);
return newItemId;
}}
这是我的 NFTMarket 合约
contract NFTMarket is ReentrancyGuard {
using Counters for Counters.Counter;
Counters.Counter private _itemIds;
Counters.Counter private _itemSold;
address payable owner;
uint256 listingPrice = 0.025 ether; // Here ether is denoting the MATIC
constructor() {
owner = payable(msg.sender);
}
struct MarketItem {
uint256 itemId;
address nftContract;
uint256 tokenId;
address payable seller;
address payable owner;
uint256 price;
bool sold;
}
mapping(uint256 => MarketItem) private idToMarketItem;
event MarketItemCreated(
uint256 indexed itemId,
address indexed nftContract,
uint256 indexed tokenId,
address seller,
address owner,
uint256 price,
bool sold
);
function getListingPrice() public view returns (uint256) {
return listingPrice;
}
//Function to create an NFT
function createMarketItem(
address nftContract,
uint256 tokenId,
uint256 price
) public payable nonReentrant {
//Conditions for creating the Item.
require(price > 0, "Price must be at least 1 wei");
require(
msg.value == listingPrice,
"Price must be equal to listing price"
);
_itemIds.increment();
uint256 itemId = _itemIds.current();
idToMarketItem[itemId] = MarketItem(
itemId,
nftContract,
tokenId,
payable(msg.sender),
payable(address(0)), // When new NFT is created its ownership add is set to 0.
price,
false
);
IERC721(nftContract).transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), tokenId);
//Trigger the Event
emit MarketItemCreated(
itemId,
nftContract,
tokenId,
msg.sender,
address(0),
price,
false
);
}
//Function to Transfer the Ownership
function createMarketSale(address nftContract, uint256 itemId)
public
payable
nonReentrant
{
uint256 price = idToMarketItem[itemId].price;
uint256 tokenId = idToMarketItem[itemId].tokenId;
require(
msg.value == price,
"Please submit the asking value in order to Purchase"
);
//Will transfer the MATIC to the seller address.
idToMarketItem[itemId].seller.transfer(msg.value);
//Will transfer the ownership from the owner of this contract to the Buyer.
IERC721(nftContract).transferFrom(address(this), msg.sender, tokenId);
//Set the local value of the owner to the Buyer(msg.sender).
idToMarketItem[itemId].owner = payable(msg.sender);
//Set this NFT as sold.
idToMarketItem[itemId].sold = true;
_itemSold.increment();
payable(owner).transfer(listingPrice);
}
//Returns number of items unsold
function fetchMarketItems() public view returns (MarketItem[] memory) {
uint256 itemCount = _itemIds.current();
uint256 unsoldItemCount = _itemIds.current() - _itemSold.current();
uint256 currentIndex = 0;
MarketItem[] memory items = new MarketItem[](unsoldItemCount);
for (uint256 i = 0; i < itemCount; i++) {
if (idToMarketItem[i + 1].owner == address(0)) {
uint256 currentId = idToMarketItem[i + 1].itemId;
MarketItem storage currentItem = idToMarketItem[currentId];
items[currentIndex] = currentItem;
currentIndex += 1;
}
}
return items;
}
//Returns number of Own(Created or Bought) NFTs
function fetchMyNFTs() public view returns (MarketItem[] memory) {
uint256 totalItemCount = _itemIds.current();
uint256 itemCount = 0;
uint256 currentIndex = 0;
for (uint256 i = 0; i < totalItemCount; i++) {
if (idToMarketItem[i + 1].owner == msg.sender) {
itemCount += 1;
}
}
MarketItem[] memory items = new MarketItem[](itemCount);
for (uint256 i = 0; i < totalItemCount; i++) {
if (idToMarketItem[i + 1].owner == msg.sender) {
uint256 currentId = idToMarketItem[i + 1].itemId;
MarketItem storage currentItem = idToMarketItem[currentId];
items[currentIndex] = currentItem;
currentIndex += 1;
}
}
return items;
}
//Returns the no of NFT created
function fetchItemsCreated() public view returns (MarketItem[] memory) {
uint256 totalItemCount = _itemIds.current();
uint256 itemCount = 0;
uint256 currentIndex = 0;
for (uint256 i = 0; i < totalItemCount; i++) {
if (idToMarketItem[i + 1].seller == msg.sender) {
itemCount += 1;
}
}
MarketItem[] memory items = new MarketItem[](itemCount);
for (uint256 i = 0; i < totalItemCount; i++) {
if (idToMarketItem[i + 1].seller == msg.sender) {
uint256 currentId = idToMarketItem[i + 1].itemId;
MarketItem storage currentItem = idToMarketItem[currentId];
items[currentIndex] = currentItem;
currentIndex += 1;
}
}
return items;
}}
我尝试更改 MetaMask 中的 RPC 和配置文件,并使用不同的帐户重新部署它多次,但仍然没有任何变化。
错误
MetaMask - RPC Error: Internal JSON-RPC error.
data:
code: 3
message: "execution reverted: ERC721: transfer caller is not owner nor approved"
Image of the console
如果需要任何其他信息,请评论
我检查了你的完整代码,它正在运行。
您继承自 ERC721URIStorage
,而 ERC721URIStorage
继承自 ERC721
如果您检查 ERC721
中的 transferFrom
:
function transferFrom(address from,address to,uint256 tokenId
) public virtual override {
// ***** THIS REQUIRE IS NOT SATISFIED *****
require(_isApprovedOrOwner(_msgSender(), tokenId), "ERC721: transfer caller is not owner nor approved");
_transfer(from, to, tokenId);
}
您收到该错误,因为 transferFrom
中的 require
语句不满足。
这是_isApprovedOrOwner
function _isApprovedOrOwner(address spender, uint256 tokenId) internal view virtual returns (bool) {
require(_exists(tokenId), "ERC721: operator query for nonexistent token");
address owner = ERC721.ownerOf(tokenId);
return (spender == owner || getApproved(tokenId) == spender || isApprovedForAll(owner, spender));
}
此功能未 returning True
。为了得到True
,这个
spender == owner || getApproved(tokenId) == spender || isApprovedForAll(owner, spender)
应该return正确。在 or
操作中为了得到 True,条件 3 必须是 True
.
在我看来,您正在尝试转移不属于您的代币。
在开发过程中,每次编译智能合约(使用hardhat compile..
之类的东西)时,都必须复制在命令提示符中生成的新智能合约地址,并将其粘贴到源代码中的指定位置代码。
感谢您的努力。
我得到了解决方案(搜索了 3 天后)。
解决方案=>
孟买目前存在导致部署地址不正确的错误。这导致 NFT 合约的构造函数批准 错误的地址 用于 NFT 购买(因为它使用市场部署的地址进行批准) — 导致烦人的 "execution reverted: ERC721: approve caller is not owner nor approved for all"
错误。
尝试使用主网(是的,你必须使用真钱)但它有效!
这是一个可以在孟买运行的解决方法部署脚本。将 deploy.js 中的 main() 替换为:
const hre = require("hardhat");
async function main() {
const [deployer] = await hre.ethers.getSigners();
console.log(
"Deploying contracts with the account:",
deployer.address
);
let txHash, txReceipt
const NFTMarket = await hre.ethers.getContractFactory("NFTMarket");
const nftMarket = await NFTMarket.deploy();
await nftMarket.deployed();
txHash = nftMarket.deployTransaction.hash;
txReceipt = await ethers.provider.waitForTransaction(txHash);
let nftMarketAddress = txReceipt.contractAddress
console.log("nftMarket deployed to:", nftMarketAddress);
const NFT = await hre.ethers.getContractFactory("NFT");
const nft = await NFT.deploy(nftMarketAddress);
await nft.deployed();
txHash = nft.deployTransaction.hash;
// console.log(`NFT hash: ${txHash}\nWaiting for transaction to be mined...`);
txReceipt = await ethers.provider.waitForTransaction(txHash);
let nftAddress = txReceipt.contractAddress
console.log("nft deployed to:", nftAddress);
}
main()
.then(() => process.exit(0))
.catch((error) => {
console.error(error);
process.exit(1);
});
使用此脚本重新部署合同,并更改config.js
。
我正在做一个 NFT 市场。当我在孟买测试网上部署我的合同时。 createToken 函数可能会工作,因为它会为 Gas Fee 调出 Metamask,但在那之后,会发生关于 ONWNERSHIP 的错误。 (下方有错误图片和文字。)
我遵循的步骤
npm hardhat node
npm run dev
- 选择创建页面。
- 输入所有详细信息。
- 单击调用 createToken 函数的创建资产。
然后出现错误。
这是我的 NFT 合约
contract NFT is ERC721URIStorage {
using Counters for Counters.Counter;
Counters.Counter private _tokenIds;
address contractAddress;
constructor(address marketplaceAddress) ERC721("Metaverse Tokens", "METT") {
contractAddress = marketplaceAddress;
}
function createToken(string memory tokenURI) public returns (uint256) {
_tokenIds.increment();
uint256 newItemId = _tokenIds.current();
_mint(msg.sender, newItemId);
_setTokenURI(newItemId, tokenURI);
setApprovalForAll(contractAddress, true);
return newItemId;
}}
这是我的 NFTMarket 合约
contract NFTMarket is ReentrancyGuard {
using Counters for Counters.Counter;
Counters.Counter private _itemIds;
Counters.Counter private _itemSold;
address payable owner;
uint256 listingPrice = 0.025 ether; // Here ether is denoting the MATIC
constructor() {
owner = payable(msg.sender);
}
struct MarketItem {
uint256 itemId;
address nftContract;
uint256 tokenId;
address payable seller;
address payable owner;
uint256 price;
bool sold;
}
mapping(uint256 => MarketItem) private idToMarketItem;
event MarketItemCreated(
uint256 indexed itemId,
address indexed nftContract,
uint256 indexed tokenId,
address seller,
address owner,
uint256 price,
bool sold
);
function getListingPrice() public view returns (uint256) {
return listingPrice;
}
//Function to create an NFT
function createMarketItem(
address nftContract,
uint256 tokenId,
uint256 price
) public payable nonReentrant {
//Conditions for creating the Item.
require(price > 0, "Price must be at least 1 wei");
require(
msg.value == listingPrice,
"Price must be equal to listing price"
);
_itemIds.increment();
uint256 itemId = _itemIds.current();
idToMarketItem[itemId] = MarketItem(
itemId,
nftContract,
tokenId,
payable(msg.sender),
payable(address(0)), // When new NFT is created its ownership add is set to 0.
price,
false
);
IERC721(nftContract).transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), tokenId);
//Trigger the Event
emit MarketItemCreated(
itemId,
nftContract,
tokenId,
msg.sender,
address(0),
price,
false
);
}
//Function to Transfer the Ownership
function createMarketSale(address nftContract, uint256 itemId)
public
payable
nonReentrant
{
uint256 price = idToMarketItem[itemId].price;
uint256 tokenId = idToMarketItem[itemId].tokenId;
require(
msg.value == price,
"Please submit the asking value in order to Purchase"
);
//Will transfer the MATIC to the seller address.
idToMarketItem[itemId].seller.transfer(msg.value);
//Will transfer the ownership from the owner of this contract to the Buyer.
IERC721(nftContract).transferFrom(address(this), msg.sender, tokenId);
//Set the local value of the owner to the Buyer(msg.sender).
idToMarketItem[itemId].owner = payable(msg.sender);
//Set this NFT as sold.
idToMarketItem[itemId].sold = true;
_itemSold.increment();
payable(owner).transfer(listingPrice);
}
//Returns number of items unsold
function fetchMarketItems() public view returns (MarketItem[] memory) {
uint256 itemCount = _itemIds.current();
uint256 unsoldItemCount = _itemIds.current() - _itemSold.current();
uint256 currentIndex = 0;
MarketItem[] memory items = new MarketItem[](unsoldItemCount);
for (uint256 i = 0; i < itemCount; i++) {
if (idToMarketItem[i + 1].owner == address(0)) {
uint256 currentId = idToMarketItem[i + 1].itemId;
MarketItem storage currentItem = idToMarketItem[currentId];
items[currentIndex] = currentItem;
currentIndex += 1;
}
}
return items;
}
//Returns number of Own(Created or Bought) NFTs
function fetchMyNFTs() public view returns (MarketItem[] memory) {
uint256 totalItemCount = _itemIds.current();
uint256 itemCount = 0;
uint256 currentIndex = 0;
for (uint256 i = 0; i < totalItemCount; i++) {
if (idToMarketItem[i + 1].owner == msg.sender) {
itemCount += 1;
}
}
MarketItem[] memory items = new MarketItem[](itemCount);
for (uint256 i = 0; i < totalItemCount; i++) {
if (idToMarketItem[i + 1].owner == msg.sender) {
uint256 currentId = idToMarketItem[i + 1].itemId;
MarketItem storage currentItem = idToMarketItem[currentId];
items[currentIndex] = currentItem;
currentIndex += 1;
}
}
return items;
}
//Returns the no of NFT created
function fetchItemsCreated() public view returns (MarketItem[] memory) {
uint256 totalItemCount = _itemIds.current();
uint256 itemCount = 0;
uint256 currentIndex = 0;
for (uint256 i = 0; i < totalItemCount; i++) {
if (idToMarketItem[i + 1].seller == msg.sender) {
itemCount += 1;
}
}
MarketItem[] memory items = new MarketItem[](itemCount);
for (uint256 i = 0; i < totalItemCount; i++) {
if (idToMarketItem[i + 1].seller == msg.sender) {
uint256 currentId = idToMarketItem[i + 1].itemId;
MarketItem storage currentItem = idToMarketItem[currentId];
items[currentIndex] = currentItem;
currentIndex += 1;
}
}
return items;
}}
我尝试更改 MetaMask 中的 RPC 和配置文件,并使用不同的帐户重新部署它多次,但仍然没有任何变化。
错误
MetaMask - RPC Error: Internal JSON-RPC error.
data:
code: 3
message: "execution reverted: ERC721: transfer caller is not owner nor approved"
Image of the console
如果需要任何其他信息,请评论
我检查了你的完整代码,它正在运行。
您继承自 ERC721URIStorage
,而 ERC721URIStorage
继承自 ERC721
如果您检查 ERC721
中的 transferFrom
:
function transferFrom(address from,address to,uint256 tokenId
) public virtual override {
// ***** THIS REQUIRE IS NOT SATISFIED *****
require(_isApprovedOrOwner(_msgSender(), tokenId), "ERC721: transfer caller is not owner nor approved");
_transfer(from, to, tokenId);
}
您收到该错误,因为 transferFrom
中的 require
语句不满足。
这是_isApprovedOrOwner
function _isApprovedOrOwner(address spender, uint256 tokenId) internal view virtual returns (bool) {
require(_exists(tokenId), "ERC721: operator query for nonexistent token");
address owner = ERC721.ownerOf(tokenId);
return (spender == owner || getApproved(tokenId) == spender || isApprovedForAll(owner, spender));
}
此功能未 returning True
。为了得到True
,这个
spender == owner || getApproved(tokenId) == spender || isApprovedForAll(owner, spender)
应该return正确。在 or
操作中为了得到 True,条件 3 必须是 True
.
在我看来,您正在尝试转移不属于您的代币。
在开发过程中,每次编译智能合约(使用hardhat compile..
之类的东西)时,都必须复制在命令提示符中生成的新智能合约地址,并将其粘贴到源代码中的指定位置代码。
感谢您的努力。 我得到了解决方案(搜索了 3 天后)。
解决方案=>
孟买目前存在导致部署地址不正确的错误。这导致 NFT 合约的构造函数批准 错误的地址 用于 NFT 购买(因为它使用市场部署的地址进行批准) — 导致烦人的 "execution reverted: ERC721: approve caller is not owner nor approved for all"
错误。
尝试使用主网(是的,你必须使用真钱)但它有效!
这是一个可以在孟买运行的解决方法部署脚本。将 deploy.js 中的 main() 替换为:
const hre = require("hardhat");
async function main() {
const [deployer] = await hre.ethers.getSigners();
console.log(
"Deploying contracts with the account:",
deployer.address
);
let txHash, txReceipt
const NFTMarket = await hre.ethers.getContractFactory("NFTMarket");
const nftMarket = await NFTMarket.deploy();
await nftMarket.deployed();
txHash = nftMarket.deployTransaction.hash;
txReceipt = await ethers.provider.waitForTransaction(txHash);
let nftMarketAddress = txReceipt.contractAddress
console.log("nftMarket deployed to:", nftMarketAddress);
const NFT = await hre.ethers.getContractFactory("NFT");
const nft = await NFT.deploy(nftMarketAddress);
await nft.deployed();
txHash = nft.deployTransaction.hash;
// console.log(`NFT hash: ${txHash}\nWaiting for transaction to be mined...`);
txReceipt = await ethers.provider.waitForTransaction(txHash);
let nftAddress = txReceipt.contractAddress
console.log("nft deployed to:", nftAddress);
}
main()
.then(() => process.exit(0))
.catch((error) => {
console.error(error);
process.exit(1);
});
使用此脚本重新部署合同,并更改config.js
。