冲突的枚举值 java

Question

我在 2 个单独的文件中定义了 2 个枚举，如下所示： MyErrorCodes.java

@Getter
public enum MyErrorCodes implements ErrorCode {
    ERROR1(90, 1, 01),
    ERROR2(90, 1, 02),
    ERROR3(90, 1, 03),
    ERROR4(90, 1, 04),
    ERROR5(90, 1, 05);
    ....
}

ErrorCategory.java

public class ErrorCategory {
@AllArgsConstructor
    public enum ErrorCodes {
        EXECUTION_ERROR("execution.error", "Error in executing {0}.", INTERNAL_ERROR,
                             MyErrorCodes.ERROR1),
        DESERIALIZATION_ERROR("...", "...",BAD_REQUEST_ERROR, MyErrorCodes.ERROR2),
        DEFAULT_INTERNAL_ERROR("...", "...", INTERNAL_ERROR, MyErrorCodes.ERROR3),
        INVALID_RESPONSE("...", "...", INTERNAL_ERROR, MyErrorCodes.ERROR4),
        MAPPING_ERROR("...", "...", INTERNAL_ERROR, MyErrorCodes.ERROR5);
   }
}

在运行时出现错误：

Conflicting enum values. Name 'ERROR4' uses ordinal value (4) that is also used for name 'MAPPING_ERROR'

ERROR4 是枚举#1 中的第 4 个元素，而 MAPPING_ERROR 是枚举#2 中的第 5 个元素。那为什么当它们是完全不同的枚举时我会收到冲突错误？

P.S。 enum#1 实现的接口如下所示：

public interface ErrorCode {
    int getErrorCode();
    String getKey();

}

堆栈跟踪：

at io.opentracing.contrib.concurrent.TracedRunnable.run(TracedRunnable.java:30)
    at org.springframework.scheduling.support.DelegatingErrorHandlingRunnable.run(DelegatingErrorHandlingRunnable.java:54)
   
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:304)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
    at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Caused by: org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException: Conflicting enum values. Name 'ERROR4' uses ordinal value (4) that is also used for name 'MAPPING_ERROR'
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.BinaryUtils.mergeEnumValues(BinaryUtils.java:2538)
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.BinaryUtils.mergeMetadata(BinaryUtils.java:1028)
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.binary.BinaryMetadataTransport.requestMetadataUpdate(BinaryMetadataTransport.java:211)
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.binary.CacheObjectBinaryProcessorImpl.addMeta(CacheObjectBinaryProcessorImpl.java:606)
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.binary.CacheObjectBinaryProcessorImpl.addMeta(CacheObjectBinaryProcessorImpl.java:288)
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.BinaryContext.registerUserClassDescriptor(BinaryContext.java:828)
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.BinaryContext.registerDescriptor(BinaryContext.java:784)
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.BinaryContext.registerClass(BinaryContext.java:581)
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.BinaryContext.registerClass(BinaryContext.java:556)
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.BinaryWriterExImpl.doWriteEnum(BinaryWriterExImpl.java:829)
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.BinaryWriterExImpl.writeEnumField(BinaryWriterExImpl.java:1323)
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.BinaryFieldAccessor$DefaultFinalClassAccessor.write0(BinaryFieldAccessor.java:670)
    at org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.BinaryFieldAccessor.write(BinaryFieldAccessor.java:157)
    ... 115 common frames omitted
    ```

Answer 1

好的，下面是我们针对该问题所做的工作和发现：

我们使用 ignite cluster 进行部署，我们将 ignite 版本从 6 更新到 7 并解决了问题。

Ignite 缓存枚举值，所以当我们引入新的枚举值时，我们应该添加到末尾以增加序号以避免将来发生冲突或清除缓存。

冲突的枚举值 java

Conflicting enum values java

spring-boot

java-8

enums

runtime-error

ignite