集中式与分散式移动应用程序门户

Centralized vs decentralized mobile application portals

最近我一直在阅读 this article 有关移动应用程序开发的内容。在第 25 页/第 28 页,他们讨论了集中式和分散式移动应用程序门户。不幸的是,这篇文章已经过时了。

假设我想对当今主要的移动平台进行分类。最初我会想出这样的事情:

你会如何完成这个?我没有找到验证这些信息的方法。 Google 即由于 Google Play 商店,应该是集中的。但是,还有其他方法可以下载 Android 应用程序,例如 Aptoide。然后是 Opera Mobile Store。您可以在那里为每个平台下载应用程序。这对移动应用程序门户的分类意味着什么?

更新: 我仍在寻找一些答案,因为我还没有弄清楚如何验证上述信息。感谢您的帮助!

更新 2: 经过进一步研究,我完成了上面的列表。但是,我仍然不确定这是否真的正确。我为那些有兴趣阅读这篇文章并帮助解决我的问题的人增加了一些赏金。谢谢

根据您提到的文章:

集中门户

In this model, one portal is proposed as the main portal on which all applications are published. This approach gives the main portal provider a competitive advantage over others. Consumers can easily find and download applications. It also facil- itates the job of developers by offering a single point of sale. Centralized portals can benefit from network effects by attract- ing more consumers and more developers. Apple and Google propose a single point of sale with the AppStore and the Android Market. However, these two platforms have different approaches. On the one hand, Apple pushes a unique and exclusive portal with a strict application review process. Google, on the other hand, does not restrict the publication of appli- cations to its portal. Moreover, there are no plans to review applications prior to publication as it counts on consumers’ feed- back to exclude inappropriate and low-quality applications.

Firefox OS:去中心化 ?

,因为:还有一个marketplace for Firefox以及您可以上传和下载应用程序的地方。

Marketplace 于 2013 年启动

Your Reference Article is outdated ! : 2010

因此它没有将 Firefox 包含在集中式门户中!

到目前为止,我认为您的列表是正确的,但 Firefox OS 有自己的市场。所以他们都有办法在商店外锻炼和安装自己的东西。也许 Android 是其中最开放的,但他们都试图让用户远离他们自己命名的市场