在Angular 单元测试中应该如何处理运行 块?
How should the run block be dealt with in Angular unit tests?
我的理解是,当您在 Angular 单元测试中加载模块时,会调用 run
块。
我认为如果你正在测试一个组件,你不会希望同时测试 run
块,因为 unit 测试应该只测试一个 单元 。是真的吗?
如果是这样,有没有办法阻止 run
阻塞 运行ning?我的研究使我认为答案是 "no",并且 run
块在加载模块时总是 运行s,但也许有一种方法可以覆盖它。如果没有,我将如何测试 run
块?
运行块:
function run(Auth, $cookies, $rootScope) {
$rootScope.user = {};
Auth.getCurrentUser();
}
Auth.getCurrentUser:
getCurrentUser: function() {
// user is logged in
if (Object.keys($rootScope.user).length > 0) {
return $q.when($rootScope.user);
}
// user is logged in, but page has been refreshed and $rootScope.user is lost
if ($cookies.get('userId')) {
return $http.get('/current-user')
.then(function(response) {
angular.copy(response.data, $rootScope.user);
return $rootScope.user;
})
;
}
// user isn't logged in
else {
return $q.when({});
}
}
auth.factory.spec.js
describe('Auth Factory', function() {
var Auth, $httpBackend, $rootScope, $cookies, $q;
var user = {
username: 'a',
password: 'password',
};
var response = {
_id: 1,
local: {
username: 'a',
role: 'user'
}
};
function isPromise(el) {
return !!el.$$state;
}
beforeEach(module('mean-starter', 'ngCookies', 'templates'));
beforeEach(inject(function(_Auth_, _$httpBackend_, _$rootScope_, _$cookies_, _$q_) {
Auth = _Auth_;
$httpBackend = _$httpBackend_;
$rootScope = _$rootScope_;
$cookies = _$cookies_;
$q = _$q_;
}));
afterEach(function() {
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingExpectation();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingRequest();
});
it('#signup', function() {
$rootScope.user = {};
$httpBackend.expectPOST('/users', user).respond(response);
spyOn(angular, 'copy').and.callThrough();
spyOn($cookies, 'put').and.callThrough();
var retVal = Auth.signup(user);
$httpBackend.flush();
expect(angular.copy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(response, $rootScope.user);
expect($cookies.put).toHaveBeenCalledWith('userId', 1);
expect(isPromise(retVal)).toBe(true);
});
it('#login', function() {
$rootScope.user = {};
$httpBackend.expectPOST('/login', user).respond(response);
spyOn(angular, 'copy').and.callThrough();
spyOn($cookies, 'put').and.callThrough();
var retVal = Auth.login(user);
$httpBackend.flush();
expect(angular.copy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(response, $rootScope.user);
expect($cookies.put).toHaveBeenCalledWith('userId', 1);
expect(isPromise(retVal)).toBe(true);
});
it('#logout', function() {
$httpBackend.expectGET('/logout').respond();
spyOn(angular, 'copy').and.callThrough();
spyOn($cookies, 'remove');
Auth.logout();
$httpBackend.flush();
expect(angular.copy).toHaveBeenCalledWith({}, $rootScope.user);
expect($cookies.remove).toHaveBeenCalledWith('userId');
});
describe('#getCurrentUser', function() {
it('User is logged in', function() {
$rootScope.user = response;
spyOn($q, 'when').and.callThrough();
var retVal = Auth.getCurrentUser();
expect($q.when).toHaveBeenCalledWith($rootScope.user);
expect(isPromise(retVal)).toBe(true);
});
it('User is logged in but page has been refreshed', function() {
$cookies.put('userId', 1);
$httpBackend.expectGET('/current-user').respond(response);
spyOn(angular, 'copy').and.callThrough();
var retVal = Auth.getCurrentUser();
$httpBackend.flush();
expect(angular.copy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(response, $rootScope.user);
expect(isPromise(retVal)).toBe(true);
});
it("User isn't logged in", function() {
$rootScope.user = {};
$cookies.remove('userId');
spyOn($q, 'when').and.callThrough();
var retVal = Auth.getCurrentUser();
expect($q.when).toHaveBeenCalledWith({});
expect(isPromise(retVal)).toBe(true);
});
});
});
尝试 1:
beforeEach(module('mean-starter', 'ngCookies', 'templates'));
beforeEach(inject(function(_Auth_, _$httpBackend_, _$rootScope_, _$cookies_, _$q_) {
Auth = _Auth_;
$httpBackend = _$httpBackend_;
$rootScope = _$rootScope_;
$cookies = _$cookies_;
$q = _$q_;
}));
beforeEach(function() {
spyOn(Auth, 'getCurrentUser');
});
afterEach(function() {
expect(Auth.getCurrentUser).toHaveBeenCalled();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingExpectation();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingRequest();
});
这行不通。 run
块在加载模块时是运行,因此在设置间谍之前调用Auth.getCurrentUser()
。
Expected spy getCurrentUser to have been called.
尝试 2:
beforeEach(inject(function(_Auth_, _$httpBackend_, _$rootScope_, _$cookies_, _$q_) {
Auth = _Auth_;
$httpBackend = _$httpBackend_;
$rootScope = _$rootScope_;
$cookies = _$cookies_;
$q = _$q_;
}));
beforeEach(function() {
spyOn(Auth, 'getCurrentUser');
});
beforeEach(module('mean-starter', 'ngCookies', 'templates'));
afterEach(function() {
expect(Auth.getCurrentUser).toHaveBeenCalled();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingExpectation();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingRequest();
});
这不起作用,因为 Auth
在我的应用程序模块加载之前无法注入。
Error: [$injector:unpr] Unknown provider: AuthProvider <- Auth
尝试 3:
如您所见,这是先有鸡还是先有蛋的问题。我需要在加载模块之前注入 Auth 并设置间谍,但我不能,因为在加载模块之前无法注入 Auth。
This 博客文章提到先有鸡还是先有蛋的问题,并提供了一个有趣的潜在解决方案。作者建议我应该在 加载我的模块之前使用 $provide
手动创建我的 Auth
服务。因为我正在创建服务,而不是注入它,所以我可以在加载模块之前完成它,并且我可以设置间谍。然后当加载模块时,它会使用这个创建的模拟服务。
这是他的示例代码:
describe('example', function () {
var loggingService;
beforeEach(function () {
module('example', function ($provide) {
$provide.value('loggingService', {
start: jasmine.createSpy()
});
});
inject(function (_loggingService_) {
loggingService = _loggingService_;
});
});
it('should start logging service', function() {
expect(loggingService.start).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
问题是我需要 Auth
服务!我只想将模拟的用于 run
块;我需要在其他地方使用真正的 Auth
服务,这样我才能对其进行测试。
我想我可以使用 $provide
创建实际的 Auth
服务,但感觉不对。
最后一个问题 - 对于我最终用来处理这个 run
块问题的任何代码,有没有办法让我提取它,这样我就不必为每个代码重新编写它我的规格文件?我能想到的唯一方法是使用某种全局函数。
auth.factory.js
angular
.module('mean-starter')
.factory('Auth', Auth)
;
function Auth($http, $state, $window, $cookies, $q, $rootScope) {
return {
signup: function(user) {
return $http
.post('/users', user)
.then(function(response) {
angular.copy(response.data, $rootScope.user);
$cookies.put('userId', response.data._id);
$state.go('home');
})
;
},
login: function(user) {
return $http
.post('/login', user)
.then(function(response) {
angular.copy(response.data, $rootScope.user);
$cookies.put('userId', response.data._id);
$state.go('home');
})
;
},
logout: function() {
$http
.get('/logout')
.then(function() {
angular.copy({}, $rootScope.user);
$cookies.remove('userId');
$state.go('home');
})
.catch(function() {
console.log('Problem logging out.');
})
;
},
getCurrentUser: function() {
// user is logged in
if (Object.keys($rootScope.user).length > 0) {
return $q.when($rootScope.user);
}
// user is logged in, but page has been refreshed and $rootScope.user is lost
if ($cookies.get('userId')) {
return $http.get('/current-user')
.then(function(response) {
angular.copy(response.data, $rootScope.user);
return $rootScope.user;
})
;
}
// user isn't logged in
else {
return $q.when({});
}
}
};
}
编辑 - 失败尝试 + 成功尝试:
beforeEach(module('auth'));
beforeEach(inject(function(_Auth_) {
Auth = _Auth_;
spyOn(Auth, 'requestCurrentUser');
}));
beforeEach(module('mean-starter', 'ngCookies', 'templates'));
beforeEach(inject(function(_Auth_, _$httpBackend_, _$rootScope_, _$cookies_, _$q_) {
// Auth = _Auth_;
$httpBackend = _$httpBackend_;
$rootScope = _$rootScope_;
$cookies = _$cookies_;
$q = _$q_;
}));
// beforeEach(function() {
// spyOn(Auth, 'getCurrentUser');
// });
afterEach(function() {
expect(Auth.getCurrentUser).toHaveBeenCalled();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingExpectation();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingRequest();
});
我不确定为什么这不起作用(与使用 inject
两次的问题无关)。
我试图绕过不得不使用 $provide
的情况,因为我最初觉得 hacky/weird 是这样。不过想了想,现在觉得$provide
就好了,按照你的建议用mock-auth
就好了!!!两者都为我工作。
在 auth.factory.spec.js
中,我只是加载了 auth
模块(我称它为 auth
,而不是 mean-auth
),而没有加载 mean-starter
。这没有 run
块问题,因为该模块没有 run
块代码,但它允许我测试我的 Auth
工厂。在其他地方,这有效:
beforeEach(module('mean-starter', 'templates', function($provide) {
$provide.value('Auth', {
requestCurrentUser: jasmine.createSpy()
});
}));
奇妙的 mock-auth
解决方案也是如此:
auth.factory.mock.js
angular
.module('mock-auth', [])
.factory('Auth', Auth)
;
function Auth() {
return {
requestCurrentUser: jasmine.createSpy()
};
}
user.service.spec.js
beforeEach(module('mean-starter', 'mock-auth', 'templates'));
My understanding is that when you load your module in Angular unit
tests, the run block gets called.
正确。
I'd think that if you're testing a component, you wouldn't want to
simultaneously be testing the run block, because unit tests are
supposed to just test one unit. Is that true?
也是正确的,因为现在你正在有效地测试 Auth
和你的 运行 块的集成,并且没有一个与另一个隔离。
If so, is there a way to prevent the run block from running? My
research leads me to think that the answer is "no", and that the run
block always runs when the module is loaded, but perhaps there's a way
to override this. If not, how would I test the run block?
作为实施,不,你不能阻止 运行 阻止 运行ning。但是,由于您的问题最终是模块化之一,因此进行一些小的重构仍然是可能的。在看不到您的模块声明的情况下,我想它看起来像这样:
angular.module('mean-starter', ['ngCookies'])
.factory('Auth', function($cookies) {
...
});
.run(function(Auth, $rootScope) {
...
});
此模式可以分解为模块以支持可测试性(和模块可重用性):
angular.module('mean-auth', ['ngCookies'])
.factory('Auth', function() {
...
});
angular.module('mean-starter', ['mean-auth'])
.run(function(Auth, $rootScope) {
...
});
这现在允许您通过仅将 mean-auth
模块加载到其测试中来单独测试 Auth
工厂。
虽然这解决了 运行 块干扰 Auth
单元测试的问题,但您仍然面临模拟 Auth.getCurrentUser
以测试 [=43] 的问题=] 隔离块。您引用的博客 post 是正确的,因为您应该寻求利用模块的配置阶段 stub/spy 在 运行 阶段使用的依赖项。因此,在你的测试中:
module('mean-starter', function ($provide) {
$provide.value('Auth', {
getCurrentUser: jasmine.createSpy()
});
});
关于你的最后一个问题,你可以通过将它们声明为模块来创建可重用的模拟。例如,如果您想为 Auth
创建一个可重用的模拟工厂,您可以在单元测试之前加载的单独文件中定义它:
angular.module('mock-auth', [])
.factory('Auth', function() {
return {
getCurrentUser: jasmine.createSpy()
};
});
然后将它加载到您需要它的任何模块之后的测试中,因为 angular 将覆盖具有相同名称的任何服务:
module('mean-starter', 'mock-auth');
我的理解是,当您在 Angular 单元测试中加载模块时,会调用 run
块。
我认为如果你正在测试一个组件,你不会希望同时测试 run
块,因为 unit 测试应该只测试一个 单元 。是真的吗?
如果是这样,有没有办法阻止 run
阻塞 运行ning?我的研究使我认为答案是 "no",并且 run
块在加载模块时总是 运行s,但也许有一种方法可以覆盖它。如果没有,我将如何测试 run
块?
运行块:
function run(Auth, $cookies, $rootScope) {
$rootScope.user = {};
Auth.getCurrentUser();
}
Auth.getCurrentUser:
getCurrentUser: function() {
// user is logged in
if (Object.keys($rootScope.user).length > 0) {
return $q.when($rootScope.user);
}
// user is logged in, but page has been refreshed and $rootScope.user is lost
if ($cookies.get('userId')) {
return $http.get('/current-user')
.then(function(response) {
angular.copy(response.data, $rootScope.user);
return $rootScope.user;
})
;
}
// user isn't logged in
else {
return $q.when({});
}
}
auth.factory.spec.js
describe('Auth Factory', function() {
var Auth, $httpBackend, $rootScope, $cookies, $q;
var user = {
username: 'a',
password: 'password',
};
var response = {
_id: 1,
local: {
username: 'a',
role: 'user'
}
};
function isPromise(el) {
return !!el.$$state;
}
beforeEach(module('mean-starter', 'ngCookies', 'templates'));
beforeEach(inject(function(_Auth_, _$httpBackend_, _$rootScope_, _$cookies_, _$q_) {
Auth = _Auth_;
$httpBackend = _$httpBackend_;
$rootScope = _$rootScope_;
$cookies = _$cookies_;
$q = _$q_;
}));
afterEach(function() {
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingExpectation();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingRequest();
});
it('#signup', function() {
$rootScope.user = {};
$httpBackend.expectPOST('/users', user).respond(response);
spyOn(angular, 'copy').and.callThrough();
spyOn($cookies, 'put').and.callThrough();
var retVal = Auth.signup(user);
$httpBackend.flush();
expect(angular.copy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(response, $rootScope.user);
expect($cookies.put).toHaveBeenCalledWith('userId', 1);
expect(isPromise(retVal)).toBe(true);
});
it('#login', function() {
$rootScope.user = {};
$httpBackend.expectPOST('/login', user).respond(response);
spyOn(angular, 'copy').and.callThrough();
spyOn($cookies, 'put').and.callThrough();
var retVal = Auth.login(user);
$httpBackend.flush();
expect(angular.copy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(response, $rootScope.user);
expect($cookies.put).toHaveBeenCalledWith('userId', 1);
expect(isPromise(retVal)).toBe(true);
});
it('#logout', function() {
$httpBackend.expectGET('/logout').respond();
spyOn(angular, 'copy').and.callThrough();
spyOn($cookies, 'remove');
Auth.logout();
$httpBackend.flush();
expect(angular.copy).toHaveBeenCalledWith({}, $rootScope.user);
expect($cookies.remove).toHaveBeenCalledWith('userId');
});
describe('#getCurrentUser', function() {
it('User is logged in', function() {
$rootScope.user = response;
spyOn($q, 'when').and.callThrough();
var retVal = Auth.getCurrentUser();
expect($q.when).toHaveBeenCalledWith($rootScope.user);
expect(isPromise(retVal)).toBe(true);
});
it('User is logged in but page has been refreshed', function() {
$cookies.put('userId', 1);
$httpBackend.expectGET('/current-user').respond(response);
spyOn(angular, 'copy').and.callThrough();
var retVal = Auth.getCurrentUser();
$httpBackend.flush();
expect(angular.copy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(response, $rootScope.user);
expect(isPromise(retVal)).toBe(true);
});
it("User isn't logged in", function() {
$rootScope.user = {};
$cookies.remove('userId');
spyOn($q, 'when').and.callThrough();
var retVal = Auth.getCurrentUser();
expect($q.when).toHaveBeenCalledWith({});
expect(isPromise(retVal)).toBe(true);
});
});
});
尝试 1:
beforeEach(module('mean-starter', 'ngCookies', 'templates'));
beforeEach(inject(function(_Auth_, _$httpBackend_, _$rootScope_, _$cookies_, _$q_) {
Auth = _Auth_;
$httpBackend = _$httpBackend_;
$rootScope = _$rootScope_;
$cookies = _$cookies_;
$q = _$q_;
}));
beforeEach(function() {
spyOn(Auth, 'getCurrentUser');
});
afterEach(function() {
expect(Auth.getCurrentUser).toHaveBeenCalled();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingExpectation();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingRequest();
});
这行不通。 run
块在加载模块时是运行,因此在设置间谍之前调用Auth.getCurrentUser()
。
Expected spy getCurrentUser to have been called.
尝试 2:
beforeEach(inject(function(_Auth_, _$httpBackend_, _$rootScope_, _$cookies_, _$q_) {
Auth = _Auth_;
$httpBackend = _$httpBackend_;
$rootScope = _$rootScope_;
$cookies = _$cookies_;
$q = _$q_;
}));
beforeEach(function() {
spyOn(Auth, 'getCurrentUser');
});
beforeEach(module('mean-starter', 'ngCookies', 'templates'));
afterEach(function() {
expect(Auth.getCurrentUser).toHaveBeenCalled();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingExpectation();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingRequest();
});
这不起作用,因为 Auth
在我的应用程序模块加载之前无法注入。
Error: [$injector:unpr] Unknown provider: AuthProvider <- Auth
尝试 3:
如您所见,这是先有鸡还是先有蛋的问题。我需要在加载模块之前注入 Auth 并设置间谍,但我不能,因为在加载模块之前无法注入 Auth。
This 博客文章提到先有鸡还是先有蛋的问题,并提供了一个有趣的潜在解决方案。作者建议我应该在 加载我的模块之前使用 $provide
手动创建我的 Auth
服务。因为我正在创建服务,而不是注入它,所以我可以在加载模块之前完成它,并且我可以设置间谍。然后当加载模块时,它会使用这个创建的模拟服务。
这是他的示例代码:
describe('example', function () {
var loggingService;
beforeEach(function () {
module('example', function ($provide) {
$provide.value('loggingService', {
start: jasmine.createSpy()
});
});
inject(function (_loggingService_) {
loggingService = _loggingService_;
});
});
it('should start logging service', function() {
expect(loggingService.start).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
问题是我需要 Auth
服务!我只想将模拟的用于 run
块;我需要在其他地方使用真正的 Auth
服务,这样我才能对其进行测试。
我想我可以使用 $provide
创建实际的 Auth
服务,但感觉不对。
最后一个问题 - 对于我最终用来处理这个 run
块问题的任何代码,有没有办法让我提取它,这样我就不必为每个代码重新编写它我的规格文件?我能想到的唯一方法是使用某种全局函数。
auth.factory.js
angular
.module('mean-starter')
.factory('Auth', Auth)
;
function Auth($http, $state, $window, $cookies, $q, $rootScope) {
return {
signup: function(user) {
return $http
.post('/users', user)
.then(function(response) {
angular.copy(response.data, $rootScope.user);
$cookies.put('userId', response.data._id);
$state.go('home');
})
;
},
login: function(user) {
return $http
.post('/login', user)
.then(function(response) {
angular.copy(response.data, $rootScope.user);
$cookies.put('userId', response.data._id);
$state.go('home');
})
;
},
logout: function() {
$http
.get('/logout')
.then(function() {
angular.copy({}, $rootScope.user);
$cookies.remove('userId');
$state.go('home');
})
.catch(function() {
console.log('Problem logging out.');
})
;
},
getCurrentUser: function() {
// user is logged in
if (Object.keys($rootScope.user).length > 0) {
return $q.when($rootScope.user);
}
// user is logged in, but page has been refreshed and $rootScope.user is lost
if ($cookies.get('userId')) {
return $http.get('/current-user')
.then(function(response) {
angular.copy(response.data, $rootScope.user);
return $rootScope.user;
})
;
}
// user isn't logged in
else {
return $q.when({});
}
}
};
}
编辑 - 失败尝试 + 成功尝试:
beforeEach(module('auth'));
beforeEach(inject(function(_Auth_) {
Auth = _Auth_;
spyOn(Auth, 'requestCurrentUser');
}));
beforeEach(module('mean-starter', 'ngCookies', 'templates'));
beforeEach(inject(function(_Auth_, _$httpBackend_, _$rootScope_, _$cookies_, _$q_) {
// Auth = _Auth_;
$httpBackend = _$httpBackend_;
$rootScope = _$rootScope_;
$cookies = _$cookies_;
$q = _$q_;
}));
// beforeEach(function() {
// spyOn(Auth, 'getCurrentUser');
// });
afterEach(function() {
expect(Auth.getCurrentUser).toHaveBeenCalled();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingExpectation();
$httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingRequest();
});
我不确定为什么这不起作用(与使用 inject
两次的问题无关)。
我试图绕过不得不使用 $provide
的情况,因为我最初觉得 hacky/weird 是这样。不过想了想,现在觉得$provide
就好了,按照你的建议用mock-auth
就好了!!!两者都为我工作。
在 auth.factory.spec.js
中,我只是加载了 auth
模块(我称它为 auth
,而不是 mean-auth
),而没有加载 mean-starter
。这没有 run
块问题,因为该模块没有 run
块代码,但它允许我测试我的 Auth
工厂。在其他地方,这有效:
beforeEach(module('mean-starter', 'templates', function($provide) {
$provide.value('Auth', {
requestCurrentUser: jasmine.createSpy()
});
}));
奇妙的 mock-auth
解决方案也是如此:
auth.factory.mock.js
angular
.module('mock-auth', [])
.factory('Auth', Auth)
;
function Auth() {
return {
requestCurrentUser: jasmine.createSpy()
};
}
user.service.spec.js
beforeEach(module('mean-starter', 'mock-auth', 'templates'));
My understanding is that when you load your module in Angular unit tests, the run block gets called.
正确。
I'd think that if you're testing a component, you wouldn't want to simultaneously be testing the run block, because unit tests are supposed to just test one unit. Is that true?
也是正确的,因为现在你正在有效地测试 Auth
和你的 运行 块的集成,并且没有一个与另一个隔离。
If so, is there a way to prevent the run block from running? My research leads me to think that the answer is "no", and that the run block always runs when the module is loaded, but perhaps there's a way to override this. If not, how would I test the run block?
作为实施,不,你不能阻止 运行 阻止 运行ning。但是,由于您的问题最终是模块化之一,因此进行一些小的重构仍然是可能的。在看不到您的模块声明的情况下,我想它看起来像这样:
angular.module('mean-starter', ['ngCookies'])
.factory('Auth', function($cookies) {
...
});
.run(function(Auth, $rootScope) {
...
});
此模式可以分解为模块以支持可测试性(和模块可重用性):
angular.module('mean-auth', ['ngCookies'])
.factory('Auth', function() {
...
});
angular.module('mean-starter', ['mean-auth'])
.run(function(Auth, $rootScope) {
...
});
这现在允许您通过仅将 mean-auth
模块加载到其测试中来单独测试 Auth
工厂。
虽然这解决了 运行 块干扰 Auth
单元测试的问题,但您仍然面临模拟 Auth.getCurrentUser
以测试 [=43] 的问题=] 隔离块。您引用的博客 post 是正确的,因为您应该寻求利用模块的配置阶段 stub/spy 在 运行 阶段使用的依赖项。因此,在你的测试中:
module('mean-starter', function ($provide) {
$provide.value('Auth', {
getCurrentUser: jasmine.createSpy()
});
});
关于你的最后一个问题,你可以通过将它们声明为模块来创建可重用的模拟。例如,如果您想为 Auth
创建一个可重用的模拟工厂,您可以在单元测试之前加载的单独文件中定义它:
angular.module('mock-auth', [])
.factory('Auth', function() {
return {
getCurrentUser: jasmine.createSpy()
};
});
然后将它加载到您需要它的任何模块之后的测试中,因为 angular 将覆盖具有相同名称的任何服务:
module('mean-starter', 'mock-auth');