如何包装另一个 class (c++)
How to wrap another class (c++)
在使用其他 OO 语言编程多年后,我正在尝试学习 c++。
我正在尝试为另一个 class 创建包装器 class,但很难弄清楚如何正确设置它。
例如,使用以下...
main.cpp
#include "foo.cpp"
#include <iostream>
int main() {
Foo foo(42);
std::cout << foo.get_barx() << std::endl;
return 0;
}
foo.cpp
#include "bar.cpp"
class Foo {
public:
// I'm trying to declare the member variable `m_bar` here. I
// don't want to be instantiating an instance of Bar yet,
// but I think that might be exactly what's happening.
Bar m_bar;
Foo(int y) {
// Here's where I really want to instantiate an instance of Bar
// and assign it to m_bar.
Bar m_bar(y*2);
}
int get_barx() {
return m_bar.getx();
}
};
bar.cpp
class Bar {
public:
int m_x;
// I seem to need this default constructor for the declaration
// of `m_bar` above, but I don't think that line should be
// calling any constructors.
Bar() { m_x = 21; };
Bar(int x) {
m_x = x;
}
int getx() {
return m_x;
}
};
当我编译并 运行 这个时,我得到了 21,但我预计是 84。我很确定我做的事情从根本上是错误的,而且我很确定它有事情要做以及我如何在 Foo 中声明 m_bar
成员变量,但我无法弄清楚完成此操作的正确方法是什么。
您需要在构造时使用初始化列表来构造 class 成员。构造函数的主体在构造完所有成员后被调用。如果您没有显式调用非默认构造函数,那么编译器将为您插入对默认构造函数的调用。例如,您的 Foo
class 可能如下所示:
class Foo {
public:
Foo(int y) : m_bar(y*2) {}
...
private:
Bar m_bar;
}
main.cpp
#include "foo.cpp"
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
Foo foo(42);
std::cout << foo.get_barx() << std::endl;
return 0;
}
在这里您应该包括一个 header(例如,将 "foo.cpp" 重命名为 "foo.h")。通常,header 提供声明,源代码(例如 .cpp 文件)提供 definition/implementation.
Bar.cpp(同样应该是 header)
class Bar
{
public:
int m_x;
// A default constructor is not required, however defining any constructor
// prevents auto generation of the default constructor
Bar(int x) : // This starts the initializer list section
m_x(x)
{
// This is assignment not initialization
// m_x = x;
}
// See the trailing 'const', research const correctness
int getx() const
{
return m_x;
}
};
foo.cpp(同样应该是 header)
#include "bar.cpp"
class Foo
{
public:
// Just declaring a `Bar` data member
Bar m_bar;
Foo(int y) :
m_bar(y) // Initialize `Bar` data member using the available constructor
{
// First, this declares a new `Bar` instance which is different than
// the class member, regardless of the fact they are named the same
// Bar m_bar(y*2);
// Furthermore, even if you did the following it is assignment not initialization
// m_bar = Bar(y*2);
// Since initialization already occurred before this point an error
// will result if the `Bar` data member isn't instantiated via the
// only available constructor, since there isn't a default constructor as
// explained above
}
// Same comment about const correctness
int get_barx() const
{
return m_bar.getx();
}
};
在使用其他 OO 语言编程多年后,我正在尝试学习 c++。
我正在尝试为另一个 class 创建包装器 class,但很难弄清楚如何正确设置它。
例如,使用以下...
main.cpp
#include "foo.cpp"
#include <iostream>
int main() {
Foo foo(42);
std::cout << foo.get_barx() << std::endl;
return 0;
}
foo.cpp
#include "bar.cpp"
class Foo {
public:
// I'm trying to declare the member variable `m_bar` here. I
// don't want to be instantiating an instance of Bar yet,
// but I think that might be exactly what's happening.
Bar m_bar;
Foo(int y) {
// Here's where I really want to instantiate an instance of Bar
// and assign it to m_bar.
Bar m_bar(y*2);
}
int get_barx() {
return m_bar.getx();
}
};
bar.cpp
class Bar {
public:
int m_x;
// I seem to need this default constructor for the declaration
// of `m_bar` above, but I don't think that line should be
// calling any constructors.
Bar() { m_x = 21; };
Bar(int x) {
m_x = x;
}
int getx() {
return m_x;
}
};
当我编译并 运行 这个时,我得到了 21,但我预计是 84。我很确定我做的事情从根本上是错误的,而且我很确定它有事情要做以及我如何在 Foo 中声明 m_bar
成员变量,但我无法弄清楚完成此操作的正确方法是什么。
您需要在构造时使用初始化列表来构造 class 成员。构造函数的主体在构造完所有成员后被调用。如果您没有显式调用非默认构造函数,那么编译器将为您插入对默认构造函数的调用。例如,您的 Foo
class 可能如下所示:
class Foo {
public:
Foo(int y) : m_bar(y*2) {}
...
private:
Bar m_bar;
}
main.cpp
#include "foo.cpp"
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
Foo foo(42);
std::cout << foo.get_barx() << std::endl;
return 0;
}
在这里您应该包括一个 header(例如,将 "foo.cpp" 重命名为 "foo.h")。通常,header 提供声明,源代码(例如 .cpp 文件)提供 definition/implementation.
Bar.cpp(同样应该是 header)
class Bar
{
public:
int m_x;
// A default constructor is not required, however defining any constructor
// prevents auto generation of the default constructor
Bar(int x) : // This starts the initializer list section
m_x(x)
{
// This is assignment not initialization
// m_x = x;
}
// See the trailing 'const', research const correctness
int getx() const
{
return m_x;
}
};
foo.cpp(同样应该是 header)
#include "bar.cpp"
class Foo
{
public:
// Just declaring a `Bar` data member
Bar m_bar;
Foo(int y) :
m_bar(y) // Initialize `Bar` data member using the available constructor
{
// First, this declares a new `Bar` instance which is different than
// the class member, regardless of the fact they are named the same
// Bar m_bar(y*2);
// Furthermore, even if you did the following it is assignment not initialization
// m_bar = Bar(y*2);
// Since initialization already occurred before this point an error
// will result if the `Bar` data member isn't instantiated via the
// only available constructor, since there isn't a default constructor as
// explained above
}
// Same comment about const correctness
int get_barx() const
{
return m_bar.getx();
}
};