`for` 循环中的 Mocha 单元测试和断言

Mocha unit tests and assertions in `for`loop

我正在开发 Gulp 插件,允许使用以不同于英语的语言编写的保留字编写 JavaScript 代码 - 它的主要工作是翻译,但这不是我想要的.

用 Mocha 和 Should.js 编写单元测试我注意到我不能像那样使用 for 循环:

 describe('Proper translating JavaScript PL into JavaScript', function () {
    var asserts = [
        {
            passed: '(tak || nie) && (prawda || fałsz)',
            expected: '(true || false) && (true || false)'
        },
        {
            passed: 'jeśli (tak) { jeżeli (prawda) {}}',
            expected: 'if (true) { if (true) {}}'
        },
        {
            passed: 'przez (zm i = 1; i <= 3; console.log(i++));',
            expected: 'for (var i = 1; i <= 3; console.log(i++));'
        },
        {
            passed: 'zm sum = funkcja (a, b) { zwróć a + b; };',
            expected: 'var sum = function (a, b) { return a + b; };'
        },
        {
            passed: 'generator snowball() { zm a = 1; dostarcz a++; }',
            expected: 'function* snowball() { var a = 1; yield a++; }'
        },
        {
            passed: 'lol',
            expected: 'zap'
        }
    ];

    for (var i = 0, l = asserts.length; i < l; i++) {
        var assert = asserts[i];
        var desc = 'should turn `' + assert.passed + '` into `' + assert.expected + '`';
        it(desc, function (done) {
            tester(assert.passed, assert.expected, done);
        });
    }
});

当我执行上述操作时,一个错误被描述为 failing 次断言的次数。

正如你所见,我们有 6 个失败,虽然有 2 个是正确的。而且,这里只提到其中一个。

我不想重复描述如下语句:

describe('Proper translating JavaScript PL into JavaScript', function () {
    var asserts = [
        {
            passed: '(tak || nie) && (prawda || fałsz)',
            expected: '(true || false) && (true || false)'
        },
        {
            passed: 'jeśli (tak) { jeżeli (prawda) {}}',
            expected: 'if (true) { if (true) {}}'
        },
        {
            passed: 'przez (zm i = 1; i <= 3; console.log(i++));',
            expected: 'for (var i = 1; i <= 3; console.log(i++));'
        },
        {
            passed: 'zm sum = funkcja (a, b) { zwróć a + b; };',
            expected: 'var sum = function (a, b) { return a + b; };'
        },
        {
            passed: 'generator snowball() { zm a = 1; dostarcz a++; }',
            expected: 'function* snowball() { var a = 1; yield a++; }'
        },
        {
            passed: 'lol',
            expected: 'zap'
        }
    ];

    it('should be kicking 1', function (done) {
        tester(asserts[0].passed, asserts[0].expected, done);
    });
    it('should be kicking 2', function (done) {
        tester(asserts[1].passed, asserts[1].expected, done);
    });
    it('should be kicking 3', function (done) {
        tester(asserts[2].passed, asserts[2].expected, done);
    });
    it('should be kicking 4', function (done) {
        tester(asserts[3].passed, asserts[3].expected, done);
    });
    it('should be kicking 5', function (done) {
        tester(asserts[4].passed, asserts[4].expected, done);
    });
    it('should be kicking 6', function (done) {
        tester(asserts[5].passed, asserts[5].expected, done);
    });
});

这些should be kicking N没关系-我一直懒得写这样的东西:

it('should turn `(tak || nie) && (prawda || fałsz)` into `(true || false) && (true || false)`', function (done) {
    tester('(tak || nie) && (prawda || fałsz)', '(true || false) && (true || false)', done);
});

无论如何,做独立的断言测试没问题。

前5个测试在这两种情况下都成功了,我们这里根本不看。 我们关注的测试是 asserts.

中的这 6 个

分开进行测试 it() 一切顺利。 在 for 循环中进行测试,一次失败会使 asserts.length 失败,另外一次失败会使其他失败。

将循环中的代码包装在闭包中:

for (var i = 0, l = asserts.length; i < l; i++) {
  (function(n) {
    var assert = asserts[n];
    var desc = 'should turn `' + assert.passed + '` into `' + assert.expected + '`';
    it(desc, function (done) {
        tester(assert.passed, assert.expected, done);
    });
  })(i);
}

或使用asserts.forEach.

JS斌:https://jsbin.com/kinuvedisa/edit?html,js,output