子函数中的内存栅栏 vs 与数据更改相同的函数
memory fences in subfunction vs in the same function as the data change
如果我将内存栅栏放在子函数中而不是放在使用数据的函数中,线程安全性是否存在差异。
底部示例包括两个版本。我想知道是否存在我不知道的差异。函数 A_function
和 B_function
是否同样是线程安全的?
#include<atomic>
using std::atomic;
using std::atomic_thread_fence;
using std::memory_order_acquire;
using std::memory_order_release;
typedef struct
{
atomic<int> lock;
int counter;
}Data;
void A_acquire(atomic<int> * lock);
void A_release(atomic<int> * lock);
void A_function(Data * data);
void B_acquire(atomic<int> * lock);
void B_release(atomic<int> * lock);
void B_function(Data * data);
void A_acquire(atomic<int> * lock)
{
int ticket = lock->fetch_add(1);
while (0 != ticket)
{
lock->fetch_sub(1);
ticket = lock->fetch_add(1);
}
//DIFFERENCE HERE
}
void A_release(atomic<int> * lock)
{
//DIFFERENCE HERE
lock->fetch_sub(1);
}
void A_function(Data * data)
{
A_acquire(&data->lock);
atomic_thread_fence(std::memory_order_acquire); //DIFFERENCE HERE
data->counter += 1;
atomic_thread_fence(std::memory_order_release); //DIFFERENCE HERE
A_release(&data->lock);
}
void B_acquire(atomic<int> * lock)
{
int ticket = lock->fetch_add(1);
while (0 != ticket)
{
lock->fetch_sub(1);
ticket = lock->fetch_add(1);
}
atomic_thread_fence(std::memory_order_acquire); //DIFFERENCE HERE
}
void B_release(atomic<int> * lock)
{
atomic_thread_fence(std::memory_order_release); //DIFFERENCE HERE
lock->fetch_sub(1);
}
void B_function(Data * data)
{
B_acquire(&data->lock);
//DIFFERENCE HERE
data->counter += 1;
//DIFFERENCE HERE
B_release(&data->lock);
}
int main(void)
{
Data dat = { 0, 0 };
A_function(&dat);
B_function(&dat);
return 0;
}
A_function
和 B_function
在语义上没有区别。内存栅栏效应不受函数体的限制。
此外,正如 Phantom 指出的那样,您示例中的内存栅栏是不必要的:fetch_sub()
和 fetch_add()
都已经具有获取 + 释放语义。
但通过以下修改,释放抓取变得至关重要:
void A_acquire(atomic<int> * lock)
{
int ticket = lock->exchange(1);
while (0 != ticket)
{
ticket = lock->exchange(1);
}
//DIFFERENCE HERE
}
void A_release(atomic<int> * lock)
{
//DIFFERENCE HERE
lock->store(0, memory_order_relaxed);
}
如果我将内存栅栏放在子函数中而不是放在使用数据的函数中,线程安全性是否存在差异。
底部示例包括两个版本。我想知道是否存在我不知道的差异。函数 A_function
和 B_function
是否同样是线程安全的?
#include<atomic>
using std::atomic;
using std::atomic_thread_fence;
using std::memory_order_acquire;
using std::memory_order_release;
typedef struct
{
atomic<int> lock;
int counter;
}Data;
void A_acquire(atomic<int> * lock);
void A_release(atomic<int> * lock);
void A_function(Data * data);
void B_acquire(atomic<int> * lock);
void B_release(atomic<int> * lock);
void B_function(Data * data);
void A_acquire(atomic<int> * lock)
{
int ticket = lock->fetch_add(1);
while (0 != ticket)
{
lock->fetch_sub(1);
ticket = lock->fetch_add(1);
}
//DIFFERENCE HERE
}
void A_release(atomic<int> * lock)
{
//DIFFERENCE HERE
lock->fetch_sub(1);
}
void A_function(Data * data)
{
A_acquire(&data->lock);
atomic_thread_fence(std::memory_order_acquire); //DIFFERENCE HERE
data->counter += 1;
atomic_thread_fence(std::memory_order_release); //DIFFERENCE HERE
A_release(&data->lock);
}
void B_acquire(atomic<int> * lock)
{
int ticket = lock->fetch_add(1);
while (0 != ticket)
{
lock->fetch_sub(1);
ticket = lock->fetch_add(1);
}
atomic_thread_fence(std::memory_order_acquire); //DIFFERENCE HERE
}
void B_release(atomic<int> * lock)
{
atomic_thread_fence(std::memory_order_release); //DIFFERENCE HERE
lock->fetch_sub(1);
}
void B_function(Data * data)
{
B_acquire(&data->lock);
//DIFFERENCE HERE
data->counter += 1;
//DIFFERENCE HERE
B_release(&data->lock);
}
int main(void)
{
Data dat = { 0, 0 };
A_function(&dat);
B_function(&dat);
return 0;
}
A_function
和 B_function
在语义上没有区别。内存栅栏效应不受函数体的限制。
此外,正如 Phantom 指出的那样,您示例中的内存栅栏是不必要的:fetch_sub()
和 fetch_add()
都已经具有获取 + 释放语义。
但通过以下修改,释放抓取变得至关重要:
void A_acquire(atomic<int> * lock)
{
int ticket = lock->exchange(1);
while (0 != ticket)
{
ticket = lock->exchange(1);
}
//DIFFERENCE HERE
}
void A_release(atomic<int> * lock)
{
//DIFFERENCE HERE
lock->store(0, memory_order_relaxed);
}